The Roaster Desk

By Kai Nakamura · Production roaster & equipment editor · Updated 2026-09-17

Loring S35 Kestrel vs Probat P25 III

Convection recirculation vs conventional drum heat transfer

→ Probat P25 III

Probat P25 III wins on installed cost — confirm Loring dealer support in your region before ruling it out.

Capital outlay: TrailsEmissions / gas use: WinnerHourly throughput: Winner
Lowest street price → ProbatFaster batches → LoringLowest exhaust VOC → Loring recirculationIR radiant profile → Diedrich drum physics

Also searched: probat p25 iii vs loring s35 kestrel

Technical schematic comparing convection and drum roaster chamber geometry
Chamber geometry: recirculation convection (left) vs cast-iron drum (right)

Decision picker

What is your primary constraint?
Batch size you roast most often?
Is gas already permitted on-site?

Specification matrix

Batch capacity

Loring

35 kg

Probat

25 kg

Heat source

Loring

650,000 BTU/h gas

Probat

750,000 BTU/h gas

Drum / chamber

Loring

Single-wall steel

Probat

Cast-iron drum

Batch time (typical)

Loring

14 min

Probat

16 min

Throughput (modelled)

Loring

116.7 kg/h

Probat

75 kg/h

Street price band

Loring

$320,000 USD

Probat

$195,000 USD

Exhaust

Loring

1400 CFM

Probat

1300 CFM

Lead time

Loring

32 wks — confirm with dealer

Probat

22 wks — confirm with dealer

Automation

Loring

Smart Roast PLC

Probat

Probatronic 800 standard

Service hub

Loring

USA

Probat

Germany
Airflow ctrlThermal stab.Drum speedAutomationCapex value
KestrelIII

Qualitative scores — verify against your roast program

Why this split

Probat P25 III leads on the weighted score for most boutiques we modelled.

Loring stays competitive when industrial throughput outweighs the price gap.

Airflow path through a commercial drum roaster from burner to cyclone
Typical drum roaster airflow: burner → drum → cyclone chaff collector

Deep dives

Recirculation vs open exhaust

Loring S35 Kestrel recirculates hot gas — exhaust temperature drops and afterburner load shrinks.

Open-drum platforms vent more heat per batch. Model your gas meter at 50% and 75% charge before signing.

Verify with vendor

  • Request OEM combustion efficiency curve
  • Confirm AHJ afterburner requirement for your address
IR radiant heat transfer

Diedrich IR drums radiate through a double-wall — different first-crack timing than convection.

Operators switching from Probat or Giesen need 15–20 calibration batches, not a copied profile.

  • Log development time ratio across 3 charge weights
  • Compare ground colour at same end temp
What to verify with your dealer

Neither OEM publishes binding street prices — quotes move with queue and freight.

Verify with vendor

  • Confirm Loring S35 Kestrel lead time and freight to your dock
  • Confirm Probat P25 III install kit and probe package included
  • Ask for three references at similar elevation and batch size

Side-by-side

Loring strengths & gaps

  • Industrial throughput
  • Best-in-class efficiency
  • Major facility requirements

Probat strengths & gaps

  • Production volume
  • Probat service worldwide
  • High gas usage

FAQ

Looking for probat p25 iii vs loring s35 kestrel?
Same comparison — Loring S35 Kestrel is listed first by convention. Verdict and spec matrix are identical either way.
What throughput can I expect?
Modelled: 116.7 kg/h (Loring S35 Kestrel) vs 75 kg/h (Probat P25 III) including a 4-minute charge/cool cycle.
What street price should I budget?
Loring S35 Kestrel: $320,000 USD (As quoted Q1 2026, US install). Probat P25 III: $195,000 USD (As quoted Q1 2026, EU/US dealer). Request refreshed quotes — neither includes install.
Which supports Cropster logging?
Loring S35 Kestrel: Yes with RT bridge — confirm with dealer. Probat P25 III: Aftermarket probe required.

Related comparisons