The Roaster Desk

By Kai Nakamura · Production roaster & equipment editor · Updated 2026-09-17

Loring S15 Kestrel vs San Franciscan SF-25

Convection recirculation vs conventional drum heat transfer

→ San Franciscan SF-25

San Franciscan SF-25 wins on installed cost — confirm Loring dealer support in your region before ruling it out.

Capital outlay: TrailsEmissions / gas use: WinnerHourly throughput: Winner
Lowest street price → San Franciscan Roaster Co.Faster batches → San Franciscan Roaster Co.Lowest exhaust VOC → Loring recirculationIR radiant profile → Diedrich drum physics

Also searched: san franciscan sf-25 vs loring s15 kestrel

Decision picker

What is your primary constraint?
Batch size you roast most often?
Is gas already permitted on-site?

Specification matrix

Batch capacity

Loring

15 kg

San

25 kg

Heat source

Loring

350,000 BTU/h gas

San

720,000 BTU/h gas

Drum / chamber

Loring

Single-wall steel

San

Hand-built steel drum

Batch time (typical)

Loring

12 min

San

16 min

Throughput (modelled)

Loring

56.3 kg/h

San

75 kg/h

Street price band

Loring

$185,000 USD

San

$145,000 USD

Exhaust

Loring

800 CFM

San

1250 CFM

Lead time

Loring

28 wks — confirm with dealer

San

20 wks — confirm with dealer

Automation

Loring

Smart Roast PLC

San

Manual

Service hub

Loring

USA

San

USA
Airflow ctrlThermal stab.Drum speedAutomationCapex value
KestrelSF-25

Qualitative scores — verify against your roast program

Why this split

San Franciscan SF-25 leads on the weighted score for most boutiques we modelled.

Loring stays competitive when low nox afterburner standard outweighs the price gap.

Deep dives

Recirculation vs open exhaust

Loring S15 Kestrel recirculates hot gas — exhaust temperature drops and afterburner load shrinks.

Open-drum platforms vent more heat per batch. Model your gas meter at 50% and 75% charge before signing.

Verify with vendor

  • Request OEM combustion efficiency curve
  • Confirm AHJ afterburner requirement for your address
IR radiant heat transfer

Diedrich IR drums radiate through a double-wall — different first-crack timing than convection.

Operators switching from Probat or Giesen need 15–20 calibration batches, not a copied profile.

  • Log development time ratio across 3 charge weights
  • Compare ground colour at same end temp
What to verify with your dealer

Neither OEM publishes binding street prices — quotes move with queue and freight.

Verify with vendor

  • Confirm Loring S15 Kestrel lead time and freight to your dock
  • Confirm San Franciscan SF-25 install kit and probe package included
  • Ask for three references at similar elevation and batch size

Side-by-side

Loring strengths & gaps

  • Low NOx afterburner standard
  • 35% gas savings vs conventional
  • Premium price

San Franciscan Roaster Co. strengths & gaps

  • Production artisan build
  • Unique roast signature
  • Premium for manual operation

FAQ

Looking for san franciscan sf-25 vs loring s15 kestrel?
Same comparison — Loring S15 Kestrel is listed first by convention. Verdict and spec matrix are identical either way.
What throughput can I expect?
Modelled: 56.3 kg/h (Loring S15 Kestrel) vs 75 kg/h (San Franciscan SF-25) including a 4-minute charge/cool cycle.
What street price should I budget?
Loring S15 Kestrel: $185,000 USD (As quoted Q1 2026, US install). San Franciscan SF-25: $145,000 USD (As quoted Q1 2026, US artisan build). Request refreshed quotes — neither includes install.
Which supports Cropster logging?
Loring S15 Kestrel: Yes with RT bridge — confirm with dealer. San Franciscan SF-25: Yes with RT bridge — confirm with dealer.

Related comparisons